It seems much more important for Google Discover

[akbhasan185]

And to be honest, I'm sorry to say kind of being click-baity. The articles that do best on Google Discover are ones that sort of hint at something salacious in the title but don't reveal it. So they're really drawing in that click, and it seems to really reward that. Now it's worth mentioning this title. This is not a title tag, like you might be used to from SEO, and it's also not an Open Graph title, like you might be used to from social media optimization.

This is part of that schema markup. It's the headline in there. This needs to be no more south korea consumer mobile number list than 110 characters. Ideally pretty close to that. There's also this image. This image needs to be 1,200 pixels wide, and again it's referenced in that schema markup. Again, that can be a very important way of drawing in that click. 4. Speed The last sort of big requirement that I noticed is speed.

than it is for Google organic to have fast loading pages, to such an extent that I've seen a lot of people out there sort of claiming that AMP is a hard requirement. Google Discover myths Now we sort of get into the myths section or the urban myths. 1. AMP AMP is definitely not a hard requirement for Google Discover. There are sites out there doing very well without AMP, even smaller, lesser-known sites doing very well without AMP.