Does the site contain original materials: reliable facts, author's reports, someone's research, analytics, etc.?
Are the topics covered fully and in detail?
Does your site contain in-depth analytics or interesting and non-obvious facts?
If content is partially borrowed from other sources, has it been reworked sufficiently to provide significant additional value in this form?
How informative and reflective are the page title and title?
Is the headline or page title perceived as shocking or exaggerated?
Would you like to share the page with friends and other users?
Would you like to bookmark it?
Does the page contain more useful data than its search counterparts?
Could such data be published or mentioned in a printed journal, encyclopedia, or book?
Reliability of information
Is the information presented in such a way that its reliability is beyond doubt? This can be supported by clearly cited sources, evidence of the author's competence, a biographical note about the author, or information about the site on which it is published. In particular, a link to the author's page or the "About Us" page of such a site is unlikely to be appropriate for the author of the AI in this case.
Can we conclude that the site enjoys great trust? Are the resource and the materials it covers widely recognized as a source of materials on the topic?
Is the content created by a specialist or a passionate person? The search engine understands that high-quality content can be created by those with some experience. This is why forums with discussions on certain topics, as well as pages where users add reviews about purchases with photos, for example, rank higher.
Does the content contain factual errors that are easily detectable? Errors in this section refer to inaccuracies in the use of facts: incorrectly stated values, incorrect formulas or terms known in the field, as well as other false or contradictory data that would be immediately detected by a specialist.
Is there enough data in the content to solve a specific question? Can oman phone number resource users gain enough knowledge from your content for themselves?
Will your content be liked by visitors who read it? What will be the user's experience after reading your content?
Will the content be interesting to the target audience? Is your business or website targeted at a specific audience for whom your content would be useful if they contacted you?
Does the content show someone's own experience? Your content should clearly and openly show personal experience and deep knowledge in the field it belongs to. For example, a photo of a buyer of a product or service in a review, a visit to a particular establishment, etc.
Has the user's task been solved? Does the site have a specific theme or is it designed to solve a specific task?
Don't create content that is only focused on search
Is the content focused only on attracting visitors from search?
Is a lot of content being created on various topics with the hope that one of these pages will rank high in search results?
Are automation tools often involved in content creation?
Do your publications mostly use other people's materials without adding anything of your own?
Are certain topics written about only because they are relevant, and not because they might interest the target audience?
After reviewing the content, might site visitors feel like they need additional information from other sources?
Articles of a certain length because you heard or read that Google considers it optimal? (This is not true!)
Are you touching on a specific topic in which you have no experience or knowledge, just to attract search traffic?
Do you answer questions that don't really have an answer? For example, do you mention the release date of a product, movie, or TV series that hasn't been confirmed? This also includes esotericism, conspiracy theories, etc.
